Tuesday, July 28, 2026

How has the India's BJP government responded to ‘Cockroach’ protests?

The BJP government's response so far has involved a careful crackdown while also trying to attract young people's support.


   Protesters celebrate after Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned following nationwide protests     as part of the Cockroach Janta Party's movement in Mumbai, India, July 26, 2026

As he situation around New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar begins to calm down, following weeks of large-scale protests against Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 12-year leadership, the government has taken a balanced approach, including both strict actions and efforts to engage with the youth.

In several states where the BJP holds power, hundreds of young people, some under 18, were arrested and charged with serious offenses.

On Tuesday, India’s Supreme Court ordered the release of all minors arrested during the protests led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), which were triggered by leaked examination papers and calls for education reforms.

However, even before the Supreme Court's ruling, many of the arrested individuals were released this week after protest leaders and opposition figures criticized the government’s handling of the situation.

At the same time, some students and Gen Z protesters are reporting that their social media accounts are being targeted, with cases filed against them for criticizing the government.


The protests began in June at Jantar Mantar, a historic 18th-century astronomical observatory near the Indian Parliament, following the leak of key medical exam papers.

This leak gave some candidates an unfair advantage and forced students to retake exams, causing outrage over years of hard work being wasted and leading to several instances of student suicides.

Here’s what we know:

What’s happening with the arrests?

The BJP governments in West Bengal and Maharashtra have stopped their actions against those involved in the CJP-led protests, following similar moves in Bihar, Assam, and the national capital territory of Delhi.

These governments stated they will drop cases against protesters who demanded the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, who resigned on Saturday, marking a rare loss for Modi.
In various places, including New Delhi, protesters were beaten with batons, tear gas, and even pellet guns.

In Bihar’s Siwan district, a police officer was suspended on Tuesday for pointing an AK-47 at protesters and firing three rounds into the air.

The government has also been accused of using AI-powered surveillance to track and arrest the protesters.


Student activist Aishe Ghosh has asked the Delhi High Court to declare the mass surveillance of protesters unconstitutional and order the destruction of all data collected during the CJP protests, according to Reuters.

New Delhi police also tried to arrest Ghosh on Tuesday by raiding the office of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM).

The CPM and CJP threatened further protests if she was arrested.

CPI (M) MP Mr. John comment

Why is the government targeting social media accounts?

Delhi Police have filed a first information report (FIR) against allegedly abusive social media posts directed against Modi and have asked X to provide details of the account that published such content.

The FIR was filed in response to a complaint that “derogatory, malicious and defamatory content is being spread on social media platforms targeting constitutional heads,” as reported by India’s ANI news agency on Wednesday.

Police have asked X to delete the alleged posts and videos immediately and have also requested the full names, addresses, and other contact details of the people operating those accounts, including login and logout information with timestamps, ANI reported.

During the protests, police were also seen recording the Instagram handles of protesters arriving at the main protest site at Jantar Mantar.

Modi’s government has often been accused by opposition parties and digital rights advocates of expanding surveillance powers and closely controlling online platforms.

The government has rejected these allegations, stating that it acts solely in the public interest.


What did the top court say?

The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard several petitions from protesters and activists seeking accountability for the alleged excessive use of force, including pellet guns, by police and paramilitary forces during the several-week-long demonstrations in New Delhi and other cities.

The court ordered the preservation of all footage, including from drones, body cameras, and CCTV, and directed authorities to ensure that protesters' data was not made public, as reported by Reuters.

Chief Justice Surya Kant stated that anyone who has committed serious offenses against innocent individuals will face legal consequences.

He emphasized the need for an entirely independent and fair investigation to ensure justice, as reported by the legal website Live Law.

He added, “An inquiry holds no value if no one is held accountable.”

How have the protest leaders reacted?

Later, Saurav Das, the spokesperson for the Chief Justice of India (CJP), mentioned that the government has not provided any written assurance that all First Information Reports (FIRs) against students and protesters will be dropped, and no actions will be taken against protesters in the future.

During a meeting with government officials, Das said they presented him with the Supreme Court’s order, particularly Direction No.

4, which permits investigations into the existing FIRs.

Das informed ANI that the government argued the matter is now “subjudice” since the Supreme Court’s directive is a written order.

In response to the Delhi Police FIRs against alleged abusive social media posts, the CJP questioned why ordinary citizens cannot challenge their government without fear of retaliation.

On Wednesday, the CJP asked on X, “Since when is an elected leader above being questioned?

In a functioning democracy, citizens have the right to demand answers and accountability from their Prime Minister.”

The statement highlighted how the state machinery is sending a chilling message by treating online criticism as a criminal act and threatening “public order,” implying the Prime Minister is beyond public scrutiny.


How is the government trying to attract Gen Z?

Meanwhile, the government has started a campaign to win over Gen Z, many of whom are children of BJP’s core voters.

According to Pew Research, people under the age of 29, including Gen Z, make up about half of India’s population.

The Hindustan Times reported that the party has been sharing a series of social media videos featuring pop culture references, casual chats, and everyday situations to deliver political messages in a way that appeals to India’s Gen Z audience.



One such video is set in a gym, where a group of young people are engaged in Gen Z-style banter, interrupted by an older trainer who argues that Pradhan’s resignation was “not a Jantar Mantar victory, but an example of democracy’s strength.”

The trainer points out that the country now has “stronger foundations” due to the government’s development of metro systems, expressways, airports, and the expansion of state-run medical, engineering, and management colleges.

The BJP has also been sharing a series of X posts using Gen Z language and style, following Modi’s rare Instagram-style vertical selfie videos aimed at engaging with the protesters.


__..__

Saturday, July 25, 2026

India’s 2026 Gen-Z Protests Briefly Explained...

20 July2026, New Delhi, India


July 20, 2026, Parliament marchProtesters and police push against barricades on opposite sides during the demonstration in New Delhi.

 During the monsoon season of 2026, India's Generation Z organized a large-scale nationwide protest.This movement had unique features: a satirical political group, backed by renowned social activist and educator Sonam Wangchuk, became the unexpected focal point of a campaign that gathered tens of thousands of protesters, mostly students and young people.Their demonstrations against poor practices and mismanagement in national college-level qualifying examinations eventually led to the resignation of the union education minister and raised hopes for broader educational reforms.For Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government, it also raised some tough questions.

When the movement started in India's capital, New Delhi, it had relatively small numbers.

However, the police's forced removal of Wangchuk from the protest area during a prolonged hunger strike in June and July prompted tens of thousands to join a planned peaceful march to Parliament soon after.Images of police actions against the protesters only intensified and broadened the movement across the country.

Cockroaches, satire, and a faulty exam  

In May 2026, the Chief Justice of India's Supreme Court, Surya Kant, made a comment referring to some Indian youth as “cockroaches,” which sparked significant backlash and led to the creation of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), a parody social media account launched by political communications strategist Abhijeet Dipke.

The party's humorous and satirical content attracted millions of followers and evolved into a social movement, addressing issues such as political disenfranchisement, press freedom, and corruption.Initially, its influence was stronger online than on the ground.

The movement soon focused on the mismanagement of India's main medical college entrance exam, the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET).

Reports emerged that exam questions had been leaked before the test.The decision to cancel the results of this highly competitive exam—where about 2 million students compete for only around 130,000 seats—was a big blow to aspirants who had spent years preparing and had expected to qualify.In the weeks that followed, more than 20 students reportedly took their own lives due to the emotional distress caused by the cancellation.A retest was held later, but protests over accountability continued.

Dipke and others who joined the CJP decided to take the protest to the streets, demanding that the Indian education minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, take moral responsibility and resign.

In early June, Dipke returned from the United States, where he had been studying, and called for a protest at New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, a known protest site.Over the following weeks, the CJP also organized protests in several other cities.

It was expected to be a difficult struggle against the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), led by the Bharatiya Janata Party.

Rajnath Singh, India’s defense minister, had clearly stated in a 2015 interview that ministers in the NDA government “do not resign” as a sign of accountability, unlike under the previous Indian National Congress-led government.

                                         Protesters were stopped from marching to the Indian
                                                           Parliament by police with batons and tear

Hunger strike, memes, police brutality and resignation

A significant moment in the protest occurred when Wangchuk joined the demonstrations in June and started a hunger strike by the end of the month to support the movement’s call for Pradhan’s resignation.As he fasted for 20 days and his health deteriorated, the support for the protest grew, yet the government did not show any meaningful response.On July 18, Wangchuk was forcefully taken from the protest site by police and hospitalized, but he kept fasting at the hospital.Two days later, on July 20, thousands of protesters, mainly students and young people, gathered for a planned peaceful march to the Indian Parliament but were met with baton charges and tear gas from the police.On July 21, opposition members of Parliament protested outside Prime Minister Modi’s home, demanding the resignation of Pradhan, Home Minister Amit Shah, and Modi himself.Later that day, some opposition leaders were removed and briefly detained by police.

Several protesters were injured by the police on July 20, and some were admitted to hospitals.

The police reported that some of their personnel were also injured by protesters.The protests intensified following the images of police actions shared widely on social media by independent journalists and protesters.Crowds continued to gather at the Jantar Mantar protest site and later moved into nearby streets.Many protesters boycotted traditional television news channels, claiming they unfairly supported the government’s actions.Protests were organized in several other cities, including Mumbai, Kolkata, and Patna.Reports indicated that police used pellet guns in some instances.

In the days that followed, there were occasional reports of small conflicts between protesters and police, with more troops deployed to handle the situation.

The administration closed some of New Delhi’s rail lines and restricted cellular internet access.There were reports that local police were monitoring and detaining individuals to stop them from joining the protest.Although Wangchuk ended his fast on July 24 after the government promised to address the students’ demands, the protest continued to grow.

The language used in the protests was modern, with young protesters using memes, Gen Z slang, creative posters, and dark humor to criticize the government and the police.

Instagram videos became the main source of information and a tool to counter false news for many people involved in the protest.Bollywood celebrities also began supporting the movement, and people from India and abroad sent food, water, and supplies to the protest site as a sign of solidarity.

As pressure on the government increased to resolve the situation and address growing demands for Pradhan's resignation, he resigned as education minister on July 25.

Cabinet minister Pralhad Joshi took over the portfolio.Pradhan’s resignation came after three rounds of talks between government representatives and the CJP.The CJP also secured assurances that the government would compensate the families of students who died by suicide, as protesters had demanded 10 million rupees (about $105,000 at 2026 rates) per family, and that no legal action would be taken against protesters in the future.The CJP called off the nationwide protest on the same day.A day later, Modi announced that a task force led by Nandan Nilekani, co-founder of Infosys, would advise the government on education reforms.Parliament later strengthened an existing law to punish those involved in leaks.

                

                                                         

Blog by Pradeep

Interesting Facts

How has the India's BJP government responded to ‘Cockroach’ protests?

The BJP government's response so far has involved a careful crackdown while also trying to attract young people's support.    Protes...